Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Ballot Access topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Ballot-access bill to define 'natural born citizen' fails after witness testimony and questions

State and Local Government Committee · March 24, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Sen. Bowling's amended 'Tennessee Ballot Access Act' sought to clarify distinctions between 'citizen' and 'natural born citizen' for ballot eligibility. Witness testimony focused on historical/legal definitions and produced sharp questions about maternal vs. paternal transmission; the bill failed in committee after discussion.

Sen. Bowling introduced an amended measure described as the Tennessee Ballot Access Act, which would define "citizen" and "natural born citizen" for candidate qualifications on local, state and federal ballots. The sponsor said the bill "requires a person to demonstrate beyond any doubt that they are constitutionally eligible and in compliance with all lawful requirements for the office they seek" and assigned parties responsibility for vetting candidates.

Witness JB Williams of the North American Law Center (self-identified: "JB Williams is my name. I work with a group called North American Law Center.") told the committee the bill is intended to enforce existing eligibility rules and said "Ted Cruz would not be eligible to run for president," citing his interpretation of the natural-born-citizen standard. Williams argued the measure would ensure election officials vet presidential or vice-presidential candidates before placing names on the ballot.

Committee members pressed the witness and sponsor on the bill's practical effect and whether it changes who may vote or run for state offices. Several senators questioned whether the measure creates new criteria or merely codifies existing practice and raised constitutional and implementation concerns. One member flagged inconsistent outcomes depending on whether citizenship derives from the mother or the father in certain scenarios, and several senators said they were uncomfortable adopting a statutory definition that could produce disparate results.

After debate and roll-call, the committee recorded one favorable vote and seven nays; the bill failed in committee.