Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Shuttle Pilot topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Budget amendment and proposed Arches shuttle prompt heavy public opposition and debate
Summary
A midyear budget amendment that would allocate county reserves toward a Moab-to-Arches shuttle pilot drew extended public comment: residents questioned using Fund 47 for a national-park shuttle, raised liability and economic concerns, while supporters urged data-driven pilot testing and highlighted tourism revenue.
The commission's proposed midyear budget amendment and a planned $3 million shuttle experiment drew sustained, often emotional public comment and several hours of debate.
Gabriel Voytek summarized the amendment, which includes updated revenue projections, salary and benefit adjustments and a $500,000 appropriation toward an Arches shuttle pilot that would be funded in part by Fund 47 and TRT mitigation money. Multiple members of the public urged the commission not to reallocate Fund 47 reserves — a restricted optional sales-tax fund commonly used for local transportation projects — to underwrite shuttle service into Arches National Park.
"I'm not claiming it is illegal to use Fund 47 funds for a shuttle ban experiment into Arches, but I think the voters were led to believe that if they tax themselves for Fund 47, it would be used for maintenance of their roads and active transportation trails and not for overturning Arches National Park decisions about transportation in that national park," Mario O'Brien said, arguing the county should not subsidize a park-operated transportation model.
Other public speakers raised liability and transparency concerns. Tory Hill, treasurer of Castle Valley, asked whether insurance, ongoing operations and future funding commitments had been fully accounted for: "What about liability? ... From your cooperative agreement, it looks like Grand County is." Several speakers said they believed the county had not provided adequate public outreach before introducing the midyear reallocation.
Supporters of the pilot urged data collection and noted expected partner contributions. AJ Throckmorton said the pilot will produce ridership and cost information and that tourism-related tax receipts are rising; business owners such as Samantha Derbyshire urged that local operators and trails be considered in planning. Commissioners debated both the policy merits and appropriate funding source before ultimately authorizing a draw from Fund 47 reserves to support the pilot.
