Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Energy Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Jerome County commissioners press for impact studies, tighter language on energy facilities
Summary
At a June 8 workshop, Jerome County commissioners urged caution on large-scale energy facilities, asking Planning and Zoning staff for impact studies, clearer definitions of agriculture and setbacks, and changes to permit timelines and industrial zoning language.
Get email alerts on the Energy Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair Ben Crouch told the Planning and Zoning workshop that Jerome County must protect “our area, resources, and agriculture lifestyle” and should require clearer evidence before permitting large-scale energy projects. Commissioners repeatedly said the county "should not be the guinea pig for testing out these facilities," and urged impact and transmission-line studies before applications are accepted.
Crouch outlined a checklist of items he wants applicants to submit, and said the county must weigh personal property rights alongside any demonstrated community benefit. "The facility should be able to demonstrate the benefit that it will bring into our community," he said. Planning and Zoning staff noted the adopted ordinance may be overly restrictive in some places and flagged the complexity of approval processes that also involve state and other authorities.
Commissioner Art Watkins and Commissioner Charles Howell both supported case-by-case reviews and stressed consultation with property owners. Howell asked for clear setback rules and soil testing before a project proceeds, comparing the needs to the standards dairies meet to limit impacts on neighbors. Planning and Zoning commissioners raised landscaping and weed-maintenance provisions and noted sound barriers could be required in some cases; one member questioned whether data centers make sense given the county’s position as a net importer of power.
Planning staff Kacie Buhler explained current zoning language that limits some facilities to industrial zones and suggested staff will draft language changes, including a proposed restriction on wind facilities, to match the Board’s direction. No formal ordinance amendment or vote was taken; staff were directed to return with proposed revisions and additional research for the Board’s consideration.
