Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Policy Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee moves to add enforcement language for district personal communication device policy
Summary
Committee reviewed District Policy 51-36 and proposed adding language under OE 11 to require superintendent response to student noncompliance; staff will collect early disciplinary data and present an October update.
Get email alerts on the Policy Devices topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Chair introduced review of District Policy 51-36 on personal communication devices and opened discussion on where enforcement language should sit in district operational expectations.
"Review of district policy 51 36 personal communication devices," the chair said as the committee began consideration of the policy's placement and enforcement. Several members argued the existing policy had not been enforced consistently and pressed for language that gives the superintendent clear authority to act.
One committee member proposed specific language to add under OE 11: "veil the superintendent may not fail to respond to student behaviors that disrupt learning including noncompliance of district personal communication devices." Staff and other members supported placing enforcement language under OE 11 to give the policy "teeth" and accountability, rather than creating a new operational expectation.
District staff agreed to collect early data on disciplinary actions tied to cell phones (infractions logged in the student information system) and present an update in October so the board could compare outcomes and enforcement effects. Members agreed to place the revised language on the consent agenda for the upcoming business meeting unless a member requests it be pulled for discussion.

