Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Beach Ordinance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee moves beach-umbrella ordinance amendment on to council after split over wind-driven shade devices
Summary
An amendment to permit wind-driven shading devices on county beaches for a one-year trial prompted public-safety and enforcement concerns; committee members split but agreed to move the amendment to full council without a recommendation and asked police to develop evaluation criteria if council approves a trial.
A committee member introduced an amendment (locally referred to as an 'umbrella ordinance' amendment) to allow wind-driven shading devices on county beaches on a trial basis for one year. Several members and public-safety staff raised enforcement and sight-obstruction concerns, saying larger canopies or shading structures could block views of the water and complicate enforcement compared with a simple umbrella rule.
One committee member described past public-safety committee consideration that had recommended against such devices, while another supported an off-season trial or limited pilot. The presenter said that violations are easier to enforce under the current umbrella ordinance because the rule is simple: if it is not an umbrella, it cannot be on the beach. Members discussed municipal inconsistencies (Surfside allows them) and the fairness of local rules.
After debate the committee agreed to forward the amendment to full county council 'without recommendation' and asked the police department to develop evaluation criteria should the council enact a trial period. No in-committee vote count was recorded in the transcript; the committee noted it could be amended or canceled by resolution if problems arise.
