Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Lawn Bowling topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission hears lawn bowling club review; staff report received and filed

Parks & Recreation Advisory Commission · August 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Commissioners received staff’s informational report on the Hermosa Beach Lawn Bowling Club and voted 5–0 to forward the commission’s feedback to city council, encouraging continued club operations while exploring ways to expand public access and cost-sharing on planned roof repairs.

Staff presented an informational report on the Hermosa Beach Lawn Bowling Club, reviewing the club’s history, membership and financial picture and describing a recently approved one-year agreement that then converts to month-to-month unless renegotiated. Cambria, the staff presenter, told commissioners the city will continue to cover utilities but the club will take responsibility for janitorial and landscaping under the new agreement.

Karen Shore, representing the club, described the organization’s 90-year history and community role: “We celebrated our 90th anniversary this year,” she said, and noted the club runs free lessons, school visits and large regional tournaments. Club treasurer Terry provided additional financial detail, saying the membership fee is $151 per year and that roughly $36 of that covers federation dues; he added the club currently has about 92 members and that some cost increases may be required if the club takes on contracted janitorial and landscaping work.

Commissioners focused on sustainability and outreach: several asked whether the club could increase local membership and expand gentle activities (yoga, tai chi) to raise revenue without damaging the green. Staff said CIP 637 (roof replacement) remains budgeted and that cost-sharing or reimbursement provisions could be negotiated if the club and city agree. After public comment praising the club’s social and health benefits, Vice Chair moved — and the commission seconded — a motion to receive and file the report and ask staff to summarize the commission’s feedback for council consideration; the motion carried 5–0.

What comes next: staff will package the commission’s feedback for city council, and the club and staff may negotiate side letters or amendments addressing cost-sharing for capital projects such as the roof replacement. The staff report noted that a full accessibility assessment of the site remains outstanding.