Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Stormwater topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board tables pool and patio variance at 6 Mountain View Avenue, requests stormwater assessment

Albany City Board of Zoning Appeals · August 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

An application to install an in-ground pool and expanded patio at 6 Mountain View Avenue was tabled after board members raised concerns about increased impervious coverage near a riparian corridor and asked for a formal stormwater assessment and additional neighborhood input.

The Albany City Board of Zoning Appeals on Aug. 5 tabled an application for an in-ground pool and expanded patio at 6 Mountain View Avenue, citing concerns about stormwater management and the cumulative effect of impervious surfaces near the Normanskill.

Owner Tim Ellis and representative Clark Henry presented plans showing an in-ground pool and patio that would raise improved lot coverage to about 43.7 percent where 30 percent is allowed in the R1-L district. Ellis and staff referenced a USDA soil report and city stormwater mapping, and Ellis played recent video and photos from a heavy storm to show the site draining to the city system. Clark Henry summarized drainage lines and told the board that runoff from the property funnels into a culvert and then quickly empties into the Normanskill.

Board members and staff expressed concern about the neighborhood context: multiple adjacent parcels already exceed the 30 percent limit for impervious coverage, and the parcel sits close to a riparian corridor. One board member urged a “macro” view of cumulative impacts and recommended a formal stormwater-engineering assessment rather than relying solely on existing drainage maps. The board also discussed alternatives such as permeable pavers, which the applicant said would add about $30,000 to the project cost.

With time limited and outstanding technical questions, a board member moved and the board voted to table the application pending a detailed stormwater assessment and additional neighborhood input. The board requested the applicant return with an engineered analysis of how the proposed pool and patio would alter runoff under typical design-storm assumptions and whether mitigation (permeable surfaces or additional drainage features) would be required.