Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Open Meetings topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Sedgwick County legal team briefs commissioners on Kansas open meetings law

Sedgwick County Board of County Commissioners · January 28, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

County legal staff told commissioners that KOMA applies whenever a majority discusses county business, including serial electronic communications; presenters emphasized narrow exceptions and the need for careful notice and recordkeeping.

Justin Wagner, Sedgwick County counselor, and Deputy District Attorney Aaron Bridal gave commissioners a refresher on the Kansas Open Meetings Act (KOMA), telling the Board that a “meeting” occurs when three or more members gather in person or by interactive communication to discuss county business. Wagner said the statute dating back to KSA 19-218 undergirds the requirement that governing-body actions occur openly and that exceptions be narrowly construed.

They warned commissioners that KOMA doesn’t require a binding vote for the law to apply: “A meeting is defined as any gathering or assembly in person or through the use of a telephone or any other medium for interactive communication,” Wagner said. The presenters emphasized that serial or repeated interactive communications among a majority — including email reply-all threads and social-media comment threads — can amount to a meeting if the discussion concerns the body’s business and there is intent to reach agreement.

Wagner reviewed common exceptions that may justify an executive session (personnel, attorney–client consultation, preliminary real-property acquisition, security measures) and stressed that executive sessions cannot host binding votes and must be narrowly tailored with motion language explaining the basis for closure. Bridal added that executive-session remedies are fact-dependent and that enforcement typically aims first at reeducation rather than punitive measures.