Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Resident questions regional board representation and special-education program access
Summary
During public comment, Krista Whitaker raised concerns about how regional-board apportionment will represent smaller municipalities and about special-education classrooms using programs without full subscriptions or materials. Staff cited state statute sections and said constituent municipalities remain entitled to membership.
Get email alerts on the Special Education topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A resident identified in the record as Krista Whitaker questioned how board representation will be apportioned across Toms River and its constituent municipalities and raised concerns about special-education program access and materials.
Whitaker noted population differences between Toms River (cited in the comment as roughly 95,000) and smaller municipalities such as South Toms River and Pine Beach, and asked whether representation would effectively reduce voices from smaller towns. She said she read the proposed policy "as reflecting the statute" and asked which statute governed the change. The staff speaker (Speaker 13) responded by citing New Jersey statutory sections: "NJSA 18A:13-9, 13-9.1, and 13-9.2" and referencing 52:4-1.6, saying the policy is written to align with those rules.
Whitaker also raised detailed concerns about special-education classroom practice and materials. She named programs used in classrooms — "Milestone, SPIRE, and Freckles" — and alleged the district lacks subscriptions and full materials while still using parts of the programs. She said, "How are we actually educating our special ed kids?" and described having had two special-education students who, in her view, "failed to get an education." The chair interrupted the public-comment time limit after Whitaker’s three-minute allotment expired. The board did not record a public response that changed the factual assertions about program subscriptions; administration noted state statute references regarding representation but did not provide detailed program-level clarifications during the meeting.

