Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Union City holds public hearing on proposed zoning amendment to regulate "redemption games"

Borough of Union City · September 16, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

On Sept. 16, 2024, the Borough of Union City held a brief public hearing on a proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1118 that would define and regulate "redemption games" (games of skill) and add rules for accessory structures on adjoining lots; no public comments were received.

The Borough of Union City held a public hearing on Sept. 16, 2024, to present a proposed amendment to Zoning Ordinance #1118 that would add definitions and regulation for permitted-use zones for "redemption games," also described in the record as "games of skill," and would add Section 701.04 to allow use of accessory structures on adjoining lots. The hearing took place at First Global Methodist Church and was called to order at 6:05 P.M. by Councilor Cross.

According to the hearing notice in the meeting record, the amendment package includes a repealer, severability language and an effective-date provision; the minutes do not record further detail on the proposed regulatory standards, permitted zones, or any staff presentation about enforcement. Solicitor Tim Wachter and Constituent Services Representative Kim Tuszynski were listed as officials present during the hearing. No members of the public attended to speak on the proposal, so the record contains no public testimony for or against the amendment.

The minutes identify the proposal by ordinance number (Zoning Ordinance #1118) and by specific text items: definitions and regulation of permitted-use zones for redemption games and addition of Section 701.04 addressing accessory structures on adjoining lots. The document does not specify zoning districts affected, fee changes, enforcement mechanisms, or an effective date for the ordinance; those details were not provided in the record and are therefore not reported here.