Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Planning Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning staff gives orientation on zoning, SMA rules and environmental review to Lānaʻi commissioners
Summary
Planner Candace Thackerson delivered a comprehensive orientation covering County planning structure, state land‑use hierarchy, zoning and overlays, permit types, digital zoning maps, and environmental review triggers under HRS Chapter 343. She emphasized the Commission’s role as community voice and final decision‑maker on certain permit categories.
Get email alerts on the Planning Training topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planner Candace Thackerson led an extended orientation and primer on land‑use regulation for both new and returning commissioners. She outlined the hierarchy of land‑use control — State land use, county general/community plans, and parcel‑level zoning — and explained overlays including Special Management Areas (SMA), shoreline, flood zones and project or planned development districts. Thackerson demonstrated how the Planning Department routes applications through multiple County and state reviewers, noted the Department’s digitization of zoning maps to reduce staff workload, and explained permit categories commissioners will encounter: exemptions, SMA minors and majors, conditional permits, change‑in‑zoning requests, and project or planned development phases.
Thackerson also walked commissioners through Hawaii Revised Statutes Chapter 343’s environmental review process (EA/FONSI and EIS), describing common triggers (use of State or County funds/lands, shoreline impacts, conservation or historic resources) and the objectives of mitigation and monitoring. She urged early public engagement and explained how planners prepare staff reports, route agency comments and recommend conditions intended to address impacts. The presentation closed with an invitation to request deeper follow‑ups (shoreline/SMA technical briefings) and a reminder that the Commission’s decisions must be grounded in the record and local context.
