Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Code Enforcement topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates enforcement tools: fines for oak removal and photographic evidence
Summary
Members reviewed enhanced fines for removing mature oaks (up to $5,000 per violation) and debated whether photographs should be permitted as prima facie evidence; members asked staff to check with town attorneys before finalizing the wording.
The board examined the penalties section of the draft ordinance, including a provision that the removal of mature oak trees without a permit would be subject to enhanced fines and could be treated as prima facie evidence of an irreparable violation. Members noted the ordinance references a maximum fine and the magistrate's role in adjudication; several said they could not recall the town ever assessing the maximum and asked staff to confirm enforcement history.
A separate debate focused on language in the draft that would allow photographs to be used as prima facie evidence of unapproved removal. One member warned this could raise legal problems because a photo may not substitute for a building official's on-site observation; another member suggested changing "shall" to "may" and consulting the town attorney. The board agreed to leave recent redline insertions in place for now but asked staff to check with legal counsel before the commission workshop.
