Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Assessment Tools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board hears difference between i‑Ready and STAR, and how Acadience factors into K–5 reporting
Summary
Board members were told i‑Ready aligns more closely with Oregon Standards than STAR and that STAR omits some components; staff said i‑Ready provides individualized 'my‑path' diagnostics and is administered three times yearly.
Get email alerts on the Assessment Tools topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
During the work session, board members sought clarity on how district assessment tools compare. A staff member told the board that 'when compared to the Oregon Standards, yes. STAR doesn't include a lot of components that are in the Oregon Standards. i-Ready more closely covers the Standards.'
Staff explained i‑Ready's diagnostic and instructional utility, noting it creates a personalized 'my‑path' program to address students' areas of need and that it is administered three times a year: a fall baseline, a midyear check, and an end-of-year assessment. Staff also noted that assessments can be administered more frequently for tier 2 and tier 3 progress monitoring.
Board members asked whether the district should treat the new i‑Ready baseline differently because this was the first year using the platform; staff cautioned the baseline 'may be artificially low.' The conversation clarified that different grades and assessments (STAR, Acadience, i‑Ready) were used across K–8 last year and that STAR remains in use for 8th‑grade math.
