Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use And Development topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council takes first-reading action on Ravenswood 4‑Corners specific plan and certifies final SEIR; plan would allow up to 3.3M sq ft under preferred scenario
Summary
After a multi-year process, staff and consultants presented the final SEIR and a preferred Scenario 2 for the Ravenswood Business District update, which the council advanced on first reading and certified the SEIR. The plan includes new community-benefits tiers, utility and TDM provisions, protections for wetlands and cultural resources, and a commercial linkage/safety‑net policy for promised affordable housing.
The City Council held a lengthy public hearing on the final Ravenswood Business District (RBD) 4‑Corners specific plan and the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). Staff described two development scenarios studied in the SEIR and recommended Scenario 2 (the larger scenario), which "permits up to 3,300,000 square feet of office and R and D," according to Troy Rinehalter, who presented the documents on behalf of the project team.
Environmental consultants reported that most resource areas would be mitigated to less-than-significant levels with the plan’s policies and mitigation measures, but that operational air-pollutant emissions and greenhouse gas impacts would remain significant and unavoidable and would require a statement of overriding considerations under CEQA. The final SEIR was revised to address public comments (including a roadway noise analysis that concluded quieter pavement would reduce noise impacts to less-than-significant for specific Bay Road segments). The specific plan updates include: revised land-use tables and development standards, a three-tiered community-benefits allocation framework (base, standard, exemplary), requirements to assess groundwater and remediation, priority benefits for affordable housing and local jobs, and a "safety-net in lieu" commercial linkage fee that obligates a project to demonstrate progress toward promised housing or pay the equivalent in fees before obtaining a certificate of occupancy for the nonresidential portion.
Public commenters included labor unions supporting local-hire and apprenticeship commitments, environmental advocates emphasizing protections for marshland and remediation transparency, and developers seeking assurances about project feasibility under current market conditions. The planning commission recommended adoption at its November hearing. Councilmembers discussed parking standards, mini‑storage as a potential conditional use, inclusionary housing applicability, and monitoring of total industrial square footage in the plan area. After deliberation the council adopted the resolutions and ordinances on first reading and scheduled a second reading for Dec. 17; staff cautioned that any major changes now could require another first reading and additional environmental review.
