Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Oversight And Accountability topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Board debates wording of grand jury response over cameras in juvenile court schools
Summary
Trustees reviewed draft responses to a grand jury report and debated whether saying the board "confirms" cameras are present overstates the board's purview; staff said the responses aim to be educational and reflect partnership with the county superintendent.
Trustees reviewed and offered edits to the county board's draft responses to a recent grand jury report. Several members warned that the phrasing in one paragraph ' particularly the active verb "confirms" ' could be read as the board personally inspecting or verifying conditions in juvenile court and community school facilities, which are in some cases managed by the court system.
"The very strong word to say 'confirms'... has different interpretations," a board member said, urging staff to "wordsmith" the paragraph to avoid overstating the board's role. Superintendent Salcedo and staff explained the intent: the responses are meant to be educational, to reflect work done in cooperation with the county superintendent, and to clarify which schools fall within the board's jurisdiction. A board member who visits juvenile court community schools said, "I can confirm if someone asked me, yes," noting she had observed cameras, but other trustees asked that the report avoid implying individual board members performed facility inspections.
Board members asked staff to revise the wording to make the response more factual and less likely to be misinterpreted in the future; staff agreed to review and finalize the wording before submitting the response.
