Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

District reports $2.3M surplus after one-time lease sale; staff recommends switching reserve to percentage

Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District Board of Education · September 10, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Santa Ynez Valley Union High School District reported a $2.3 million surplus for 2024–25 driven largely by a $1.2 million sale of a Sprint lease and one-time revenues; staff proposed moving from a static $3 million reserve to a percentage-based minimum (20–35%).

The district's chief business official, Alicia, told the board the unaudited actuals for 2024–25 show a $2.3 million surplus after a sustained deficit-reduction effort. She said the surplus reflects a combination of underspending (about $650,000), one-time revenues including a $1.2 million sale of a Sprint lease, $16,000 in student device sales, a $32,000 class-action settlement, STRS reimbursements and higher-than-projected lottery and facility rental receipts.

"This was kind of the perfect storm," Alicia said, explaining that the Sprint lease sale and several other one-time items produced the large influx that accelerated the district's deficit reduction plan. She cautioned that the gain does not eliminate structural pressures and highlighted cash-flow timing issues that require prudent reserves; monthly payroll and benefits run around $700,000.

Staff recommended the board consider changing its reserve policy from a static $3,000,000 minimum to a percentage-based approach that grows with the budget. Alicia recommended considering a range of 25% to 35% and implementing any shift incrementally so program needs (such as filling hard-to-staff positions) are not immediately constrained. Board members questioned how quickly an incremental climb could be implemented without harming near-term hiring needs such as music or arts positions.

The board voted to approve the unaudited actuals and directed staff to return with language for a reserve-policy change and options for staged implementation.