Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Charter Change topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents clash over proposed removal of ward veto and zoning changes at public hearing
Summary
Multiple residents at the Aug. 3 meeting urged opposing outcomes on the proposed abolition of the ward veto and residential-to-multifamily charter changes. Some Charter Review Commission members defended elimination as promoting equal votes; opponents warned of loss of local checks and neighborhood character.
A heated public exchange at the Solon City Council meeting on Aug. 3 centered on the proposed charter changes that would eliminate the ward veto and permit residential-to-multifamily reclassifications. Speakers on both sides urged greater outreach and said the issue should be decided by voters.
Elizabeth Kalinowski, a member of the Charter Commission, argued in favor of eliminating the ward veto, saying it gives some residents effectively greater voting power based on arbitrary ward lines: "The ward veto essentially allows for some members of the community to have a vote worth more than others...We feel that things should be done in the best interest of the city and of the citizens of the city as a whole," she said.
By contrast, multiple residents including Gary Kelly, Joanne Kelly and John Sendereck urged preserving the ward veto as a neighborhood protection tool. "I think removing it or possibly removing it creates a real loss to the city and to the residents," Gary Kelly said. Other speakers warned that changing single-family zoning to multifamily could allow apartment complexes or cluster homes next to established neighborhoods and said there had been inadequate citizen outreach.
Councilors clarified that the council had voted to put the ward veto question on the ballot; however, the housing/zoning ordinance under discussion was tabled for further consideration. No final charter change was adopted that night by the council beyond the master-plan date amendment; the ballot process will proceed according to the council's prior vote.
