Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Roads topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents press board on road maintenance, reassessment and county spending; county defends golf course funding
Summary
Multiple residents urged the board for road repairs, criticized recent tax increases and questioned county spending on a money-losing golf course; officials said the golf course brought in about $329,532.78 last year and that some expenditures are required by state/local arrangements.
A series of public commenters used the citizen-expression period to press the Scott County Board of Supervisors on road maintenance, county spending priorities and reassessment contracts.
Danny Kester from East Carriage Valley opened the public comment period saying, "4 members of this board just voted for higher taxes on our fixed income and disabled citizens of this county," and asked a series of specific questions about county expenditures and whether departments' budget requests are reviewed. Other residents — including Peggy and Bob Tice — emphasized deteriorated dirt roads (Snowflake Road) and urged more VDOT work orders and state funding. The board directed residents to submit VDOT work orders and offered assistance following up when residents did not receive responses.
County officials defended some expenditures and explained constraints. County staff said the golf-course operation shows a 2026 actual of $329,532.78 in receipts and that while the course operates at a loss as a county service, it provides community recreational services comparable to other parks. Administrators also explained some school-related outlays (local match requirements) are driven by state funding formulas and that those items are sometimes not directly controllable by the board.
Fire and emergency services leaders and business owners (including Weber City Fire Chief Bruce Cross) warned that poor road conditions hamper emergency responses, especially for larger hazmat or fire trucks. Board members asked staff to continue pursuing VDOT work orders, grant funding and to keep residents informed about reassessment RFP timelines.
