Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Voice topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees debate models for student board members; ask staff for proposals
Summary
Trustees discussed adding student board members and requested staff return with models (two longer-term middle‑school members vs. rotating representatives), mentorship/training options and guidance on compensation and diversity priorities.
Adding students to the board dais drew extended discussion March 12 as trustees weighed several models for participation and asked staff to return with recommendations.
Trustees outlined two primary options: (1) two middle‑school student board members serving longer terms to develop leadership capacity and provide continuity, or (2) a rotating model that admits a larger number of students for limited periods to broaden participation and hear from students who are not already in leadership roles. Several trustees emphasized intentionally recruiting students from historically underrepresented groups and those who have not traditionally held leadership roles.
Board members suggested operational details to make the role meaningful: create a short, district‑run training curriculum (rather than sending every participant to external institutes), schedule student attendance during the first hour of meetings so students are not present for late‑night items, offer mentorship by trustees or staff and consider modest compensation or meals if legally permitted. Trustees asked staff to return with implementation options, legal guidance on compensation, suggested selection criteria and proposals for rotation length and onboarding.
Trustees did not take action; the conversation concluded with direction to district staff to produce models and cost/operational details for future board consideration.
