Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Planning commission backs keeping planner signature on subdivision plats, reframed to represent DRC
Summary
The Vineyard Planning Commission voted to forward a staff proposal that keeps a planner signature block on final subdivision plats but redefines the signatory as a representative of the Development Review Committee (DRC) to accommodate recent staffing changes.
Get email alerts on the Subdivision Code topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Vineyard Planning Commission voted to forward staff's proposed amendment to the city's subdivision code that retains a planner signature block on recorded final plats but changes the meaning of that signature so it represents the land use authority, the Development Review Committee (DRC).
Anthony Fletcher, a planning department staffer, told the commission the change is intended to preserve the city's review process while providing administrative flexibility after the city's organizational chart eliminated a single "city planner" title. "We will still have a planner...but we're not the city planner who's the community development director," Fletcher said, explaining the proposal would have a planner sign "in the capacity of representing the land use authority." He added the change would make the municipal code "a lot more bulletproof." (Anthony Fletcher.)
Fletcher outlined the DRC membership — chair of the planning commission, city manager (or mayor designee), fire marshal, and department heads for building, community development/planning, engineering, and parks and recreation — and said the draft ordinance would permit department heads to designate a capable representative when absent. Staff recommended forwarding a positive recommendation to city council with the revised language.
Commissioners debated alternatives such as changing the formal definition of "city planner," letting the planning commission chair sign, or removing the planner block entirely (as some jurisdictions do). Commissioners expressed concern about making permanent municipal code changes in response to temporary staffing decisions and discussed a more comprehensive future code review. The commission's motion will be forwarded to city council for final action; the council retains the final decision.
