Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grading Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Committee questions district's plus/minus GPA weighting; superintendent offers review
Summary
Members raised concerns that the district's use of plus/minus increments (about 0.333) and prior adjustments to AP/honors bumps affect scholarships and college comparisons; the superintendent agreed to research surrounding schools and college practices.
Committee members pressed staff on how pluses and minuses affect students' GPAs and scholarship eligibility. A member asked whether the district's use of plus/minus and fractional increments matches neighboring districts or colleges, noting that some schools do not weight pluses and minuses into GPA calculations.
The superintendent said the weighting scale predated his tenure but that he changed the AP weight and honors weight early in his administration: "I changed the weighting scale, I think, my 2nd year from the AP bump of 1.5 down to 1 and the honors bump from 1 to 0.5," he said. He acknowledged the potential distributional effects—"you've theoretically hurt 17 kids, but you've helped 28 kids"—and offered to have staff pull counts on how many students gain or lose under the present scale and to check college expectations.
Members requested that staff compare local high-school GPA practice with the colleges most of their students apply to and return findings to the committee. The superintendent recommended examining both weighted and unweighted reporting because colleges commonly request unweighted GPAs even where districts use internal weighting for class rank.
