Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Transparency topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public raises questions about minutes and rainy-day fund; board points to investment policy
Summary
Public commenters asked whether a recent large donation is in the endowment and raised concerns that minutes are a year behind; staff said the donation went to the endowment and noted rainy-day rules are in the investment policy rather than the bylaws.
During the public comment period Pam Precept asked whether a recent large donation to WLRH had been placed in the endowment or the rainy-day fund; the presenter replied, "It goes into the endowment." He added that any withdrawal from investment accounts must be approved by the board.
Precept also raised transparency concerns, saying minutes were not posted and were "a year in arrears." Several public commenters and board members discussed whether the rainy-day fund rules appear in bylaws or an investment policy; staff said uses and withdrawal limits are covered in the investment policy and that changes to policy require board action. Liz Laney asked for clarification on what qualifies for rainy-day withdrawals; staff and members said the investment policy contains limits and that the governor may specify allocations for certain funds. The board agreed to circulate the operating agreements and related documents for review.
