Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Student Discipline topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Parent raises Fourth Amendment and safety concerns over district phone-discipline policy; board pledges review
Summary
A public commenter urged the board to reconsider disciplinary measures in the district's cell-phone policy, arguing extreme confiscation can create safety and constitutional concerns; the board agreed to put the policy review on a future agenda and to consult legal counsel.
During public comment, Steve Vigil identified himself and urged the board to reconsider the district's disciplinary approach to its cell-phone policy, arguing that lengthy confiscations can pose safety risks for students who serve as caretakers and raising Fourth Amendment concerns about seizures.
"I do feel that having cell phones out of the schools...from a safety standpoint it's gonna be putting their safety at risk," Vigil said, describing circumstances in a rural community where students may need phones to coordinate family pickups. He also argued the district's confiscation practice amounts to a Fourth Amendment violation because a phone can be taken without a crime having been committed.
Board members responded by noting the state enacted a statute this past year leaving implementation details to local districts and that the existing policy had been reviewed by legal counsel when adopted. The board asked staff to schedule a formal review of the cell-phone policy at a future meeting, to ensure notification procedures for parents are followed and to have legal staff available to clarify constitutional and statutory implications.
