Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Quiet Zone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Report says corridor could qualify for a quiet zone now; board weighs $1.5M of recommended work
Summary
Board members debated a BNSF quiet-zone report that recommends expensive infrastructure to make a quiet zone self-sustaining but also shows the corridor may qualify 'as is' for establishment; infrastructure and finance committees will meet jointly to verify thresholds and costs, and the transcript references wayside-horn recommendations for Shabbona Road.
Get email alerts on the Quiet Zone topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The village reviewed the BNSF quiet-zone report and options to establish a quiet zone along the railroad corridor. Several members argued the corridor currently meets the threshold for establishment without undertaking the full set of recommended capital projects, which the report estimated could approach $1.5 million, while the consultant recommended supplemental measures (wayside horns, closures) to make the zone self-sustaining and avoid repeated requalification.
One committee member summarized the difference between immediate qualification and the larger recommended package, saying, “we qualify for the quiet zone without doing anything else,” and argued the board could file the notice of intent and establish the quiet zone now while phasing in other improvements. The report also recommended wayside horns at a crossing identified in the transcript as 'Shavona Road'; the village’s official place name is Shabbona Road and that normalization is noted.
Members asked for verification of which numerical threshold in the report is the correct qualifying metric (the consultant document shows multiple numbers that vary throughout the text), and they asked infrastructure and finance committees to meet jointly and to seek clarifications from the railroad, the state commerce commission and, if feasible, the Federal Railroad Administration before committing to major capital spending.
Why it matters: establishing a quiet zone affects public safety, pedestrian/vehicle movements at crossings and could require expensive, multi-year capital work; the board must decide whether to pursue the minimal steps to qualify now or invest heavily to ensure the zone remains self-sustaining as traffic patterns change.

