Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Pipeline Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Residents urge transparency and raise cost, growth concerns over sewer pipeline plan
Summary
Public commenters told the Los Olivos board they were worried about the affordability of the proposed sewer connection, one citing a previously mentioned figure of 'about 60,' and another warned that building a pipeline would be growth-inducing and urged regional solutions to avoid placing the cost solely on local property owners.
Get email alerts on the Pipeline Funding topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Public comment at the Los Olivos Community Services District meeting on Dec. 10 focused on the financing and community effects of the proposed sewer pipeline and connections.
A resident told the board that property owners had been left worrying about the cost of connecting to the proposed sewer, saying some attendees at a prior meeting cited a number of "about 60" (as the resident recalled) and that many property owners “didn't have the monies” to absorb the cost. The speaker urged the board to consider delaying policy action if outside grant funding will not be available and warned the board that moving ahead without funding could leave local owners absorbing high costs.
Miss Roar, introduced by the chair to speak, criticized individualized outreach and said the district must provide a single public explanation of the funding strategy rather than answering privately. She also said a pipeline would be growth-inducing: "Once we do that, that's growth inducing," and urged the board to pursue regional projects and funding partners so the financial burden would not fall solely on district residents.
Board members acknowledged those concerns and discussed scheduling workshops and Prop 218 timing to give the public a clearer picture of potential assessments and allocation methods before any vote. The meeting did not produce a final decision about assessments or a Prop 218 timetable; the board agreed to prioritize assessments, allocation methodology and community workshops in upcoming meetings.

