Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Water Quality Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Rice Creek manager: Hugo paid $500,763 in 2024; urges more watershed dollars spent locally

City of Hugo City Council · October 21, 2024
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

John Waller, a manager on the Rice Creek Watershed District board, told the Hugo City Council that the city paid $500,763 in watershed taxes in 2024, highlighted local water-quality gains and urged policies to return more collected funds to Washington County.

John Waller, a manager on the Rice Creek Watershed District board, told the City of Hugo on Oct. 21 that Hugo paid $500,763 in Rice Creek watershed taxes in 2024 and urged the city to press for a larger share of locally collected watershed dollars to be spent within Washington County.

Waller said the district has made measurable progress — noting that "Bald Eagle Lake came off the impaired list," and described several funding mechanisms that have supported projects. He told council that last year the district received "over $900,000 of clean water money" to support an alum (ALM) treatment project on Centerville Lake and outlined how projects can be initiated: by the board, by city petitions, or by citizen petitions and lake associations.

During Q&A, Waller described the project-selection process, including a citizens advisory committee review for smaller cost-share projects (he said eligible residents can receive up to $7,500 for rain-garden or curb-cut work). He also summarized a legislative effort he championed to ensure more money collected locally is spent locally: according to Waller, his draft bill allowed counties to have "90%" of the funds they collect be spent in the collecting county, and he said there is precedent for similar language in other metropolitan funding streams.

Waller warned of large deferred-maintenance costs if drainage systems are neglected, offering a Ramsey County example: "that's gonna be around $30,000,000" for certain ditch repairs if work is postponed. He also described operational issues such as local beaver-related flooding and said the district has limited authority to remove beavers; staff and cities often must coordinate on those responses.

Council thanked Waller for the update and noted the city will consider his reappointment request and whether to provide a formal support letter. Waller asked staff to be "aggressive when they come to the partners meeting" to press for greater local reinvestment of watershed dollars.

Provenance: presentation and discussion with John Waller (Rice Creek) introduced SEG 534; remarks and Q&A concluded SEG 1007.