Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Resilience Hubs topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission weighs three options for resilience‑hub pilot as NCJC reports concrete outcomes
Summary
Staff summarized three pathways for the resilience‑hub pilot—continue the original three‑year model with $50,000 implementation grants, a revised model that emphasizes planning and outside fundraising, or pause the program given budget constraints; NCJC and the bike library were cited as positive pilot outcomes tied to emergency‑management coordination and follow‑on grants.
Sarah Gardner laid out three possible pathways for the resilience‑hub pilot now concluding its third year: (1) continue the program as originally designed with planning plus $50,000 implementation grants for new hubs; (2) adopt a revised model that continues planning support and seeks outside fundraising partners to pay for implementation; or (3) stand the program down until funding is restored. "The 1st way would be to continue this program as originally designed," Gardner said, noting that continuing the full grant model in the near term would require tradeoffs elsewhere in the climate action budget.
Commissioners asked for performance evidence and accountability measures; staff said grantees present plans and later return to report outcomes and that many grants are reimbursement‑based to provide municipal oversight. Gardner described NCJC's use of a planning facilitator, an extreme‑heat scenario workshop with public health, and follow‑on funding for shade structures as examples of tangible outcomes from the pilot.
