Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Zoning Use topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

BZA denies Lakehouse LLC request to allow permanent campers at mobile‑home park

Noble County Board of Zoning Appeals · August 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The board declined a petition to permit permanent placement of campers/RVs at the Lakehouse Mobile Home Park, citing ordinance square-foot standards and unsettled questions about classification, safety and notice; staff read the findings that led to denial.

The Noble County Board of Zoning Appeals rejected MB Lakehouse LLC’s request to allow permanent placement of campers and RVs on lots at the Lakehouse Mobile Home Park (3051 E. State Road 8). Staff noted a discrepancy between the UDO requirement for mobile-home living space (960 square feet) and campers, which are not classified as mobile homes under the ordinance.

Theresa, the planning staff member, told the board "A camper is not considered a mobile home," and raised other technical questions about occupancy, permitting and square footage. During public comment, residents and the HOA president raised concerns about sewer capacity, fire access inside tight lanes, electrical hookups and precedent for backlot development and increased boat access. The applicant and supporters argued the owner had cleaned the property and that sewer capacity could accommodate additions; one sewer district representative told the board the system was designed for 11 trailers and "the sewer is no problem."

After public testimony, board members moved to findings of fact. Staff read the findings into the record and stated, "Based on the findings of fact number 3 and number 4, the petition fails." The board therefore did not grant the requested permanent-use variance for campers as presented. The decision leaves in place the requirement that any year-round residential units meet the UDO and applicable permitting standards; applicants may return with a modified proposal or pursue other administrative approvals.