Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Public Map topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Parks committee asks council to help publish lanes survey as public-facing map

Parks, Open Space and Lanes Committee · January 28, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Parks, Open Space and Lanes Committee recommended asking city council to collaborate on a public-facing version of a lanes survey—an online or printed map—to improve public access, evacuation information and wayfinding; members discussed funding, GIS links and a short council presentation.

Chair Charlie Harrington opened the discussion on converting the committee's lanes survey into a format the public can use, saying the draft report mirrors last year’s structure and could serve as the basis for a web map.

"So, hopefully, you've seen that the structure here is largely the same as last year's letter," Harrington said as he outlined the idea of a public-facing product for the city's Parks and Open Spaces pages. He proposed asking the city to "collaborate with our committee on a public-facing version of the output of this ongoing study," including a web map with pictures and descriptive pages for individual lanes.

Tony, the public-works staff member who supported the lane work, told the committee the study already has internal utility and could be presented to council in a condensed form. "It's very usable as a source of information," Tony said, noting the city could adopt the material internally or work with the committee to publish a public-facing version with GIS links and map integration.

Members discussed asking council not for an immediate, large budget appropriation but for support to develop a small professional product—an online map or printed community map—possibly funded through standard city budgeting channels. The committee also agreed that a short 10–15 minute presentation to council would be more effective than a full 20-minute walkthrough.

Next steps: the committee will revise the priorities letter to explicitly request council collaboration on a community-facing map and include suggested formats (website map, QR-linked signage) and recommended follow-up steps for staff and council review.