Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Survey Quality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
County staff and surveyor clash over frequency of CSM errors; office burden highlighted
Summary
A disagreement emerged over how often certified survey maps contain errors. A county surveyor characterized errors as widespread; county staff and an attorney pushed back, describing a range of errors and emphasizing the county's recurring workload when legal descriptions are unclear.
Get email alerts on the Survey Quality topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
A heated exchange focused on the quality of survey submissions and the county office burden they create. Surveyor (Speaker 4) said many CSMs arrive with problems, at one point characterizing the rate as "99.9% of the time" for items requiring review. County staff (Speaker 2) and Attorney (Speaker 3) disputed that scale: Speaker 3 said in his experience only a small percentage of surveys have errors that materially affect boundary identification.
County staff described frequent public calls asking "what do I own?" when legal descriptions are unintelligible on the ground and argued that clear survey standards could reduce repeated staff time and sheriff-office visits to resolve disputes. The committee acknowledged both the protective value of surveys and that requiring them everywhere could be burdensome and costly for landowners.

