Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Governance topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Council rejects proposed changes to rules of conduct and public-comment limits on first reading
Summary
Council read and failed ordinance 16‑6‑24 (amend Article 1.12) on first reading; the draft would have shortened public-comment time and added residency/business-owner requirements for commenters. Members and public commenters disagreed over limits on who may speak.
Council read ordinance 16‑6‑24 (an amendment to Article 1.12 — rules of council) on first reading; recorded votes showed three yays and four nays and the measure failed the first-reading vote. The proposed changes would have clarified that council follows Roberts Rules of Order, shortened public-comment time in some cases, and added behavior and consequence language in the rules-of-council article.
Members debated both substance and timing of the ordinance. One councilor said the draft simplified Roberts Rules language for public clarity but another said the proposal was "perfunctory" and that the council should prioritize the budget and zoning matters. Several councilors supported mirroring residency language that appears in other local bodies and asked that any amendment clarifying that commenters be city residents or city business owners be returned for a future first reading.
Public commenters raised concerns that residency restrictions would bar nearby residents who identify as Erie (for example, Mill Creek residents who use Erie addresses) and urged the council to preserve open public comment. Cindy Treiber and others also linked the rules debate to broader concerns about police oversight and public trust.
