Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Legacy Square topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge smaller, community‑first Legacy Square and oppose 300‑space parking lot

Tomball City Council · August 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Artists and neighbors urged the council and Tomball EDC to favor a modest, phased cultural-arts reuse of Legacy Square and warned against a proposed 300‑space concrete lot that would place vehicle traffic and an entrance between existing homes.

Debbie Daigle, president of the Tomball Art League, told the council she hopes Legacy Square becomes a community cultural space with classrooms, workshops and student shows rather than a development designed primarily to maximize revenue. "We could begin modestly using existing buildings, grow in response to demand, and become something completely suited to town hall," Daigle said during public comment.

Several other residents backed arts and makerspace uses but pressed the city to protect nearby neighborhoods. Lisa Daniels, who lives on North Oak Street behind Fellowship Hall, strongly opposed a proposed 300‑space concrete parking lot and the plan to place its entrance between two existing homes across from her front porch. She told council the lot would introduce “constant vehicle flow during events, increased congestion on neighborhood streets, and the disruption of normal residential traffic patterns.”

Michael Pierce said the project offers a big opportunity for Tomball but urged officials to "start small and start now," and to hold workshops so residents and project leaders can develop middle‑ground plans. Another resident suggested a neighborhood shuttle and other ways to reduce car demand rather than increasing pavement.

City and TEDC staff acknowledged the concerns during the workshop and said public feedback had already prompted revisions to early concepts. Council members and developers were repeatedly reminded that no final decisions or construction funding will be approved without additional public process and individual council votes.