Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Colocation Telegraph Road topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Telegraph Road Solar seeks threshold ruling on adjacency; staff seeks show-cause process for adjacent projects

Public Service Commission · August 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Telegraph Road Solar asked the commission to find that a public road breaks parcel adjacency so its 5 MW project may proceed; staff recommended confirming Telegraph Road as senior-priority but ordering adjacent projects to show cause or negotiate agrivoltaics/LMI exemptions. Commissioners took the issue under advisement.

Staff presented the Telegraph Road Solar 1 LLC request and recommended treating parcels separated only by a roadway as adjacent for colocation analysis under PUA §7-306.2(d)(13), concluding Telegraph Road should be treated as the senior-priority project and allowed to proceed but that North Telegraph and Sand Hill Solar should be directed to show cause within 45 days or submit a joint compliance plan demonstrating agrivoltaics or 75% LMI aggregation.

Telegraph Road's counsel, Eric Wallace, urged the commission to apply the same logic used in the commission's earlier Ameresco decision and treat a public right-of-way as breaking adjacency. "If there is a public right of way that separates the parcel, then they're not collocated," Wallace argued, saying a clear threshold ruling would let Telegraph Road proceed with financing and construction without an abrupt late-stage redesign. He suggested a longer, 90-day window if the commission orders negotiation among colocated developers.

Commissioners discussed whether the pilot-program definition that counts parcels across a road as adjacent should carry forward, whether the commission or the General Assembly must set a clearer standard (distance- or sight-line-based), and the risk of creating a precedent that undermines statutory colocation limits. Staff signaled willingness to post queue/registry information publicly to reduce surprises; the commission took the matter under advisement for further deliberation and possible rulemaking.