Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Grading Policy topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Trustees pull errata revisions to grading policy after teacher raises concerns
Summary
A high school teacher's emailed comments prompted trustees to move all errata revisions to a first-reading process; the board agreed to hear principal input and hold the revisions for fuller review.
Trustee Smith read an emailed patron input from Bridal Wirtz of Caldwell High School opposing errata changes to policy 26-20 (grading and progress reports) and policy 35-70-p (student records). The email raised substantive concerns: that a grade floor (assigning 50% for missing work) undermines record accuracy, that the phrase "good faith effort" is subjective, and that grade inflation could obscure students' needs.
Wirtz's emailed objection stated, "Firstly, I have ethical problems related to giving students a 50% on an assignment that was not earned." During discussion trustees agreed such substantive edits should go to a first reading and suggested principals be invited to provide input in July. Trustee Stone moved to pull the errata revisions and hold them for a future first reading; the motion was seconded and carried by a voice vote. Board members emphasized the need for more principal-level input before final action.
