Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Pipeline Public Opposition topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Residents urge Chatham County commissioners to oppose Enbridge 28-mile pipeline

Chatham County Board of Commissioners · August 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Hundreds of residents, landowners and local organizers pressed the Chatham County Board of Commissioners to oppose a proposed 28-mile Enbridge natural gas pipeline, calling for special-use permits, environmental reviews and local intervention in state regulatory dockets.

Hundreds of residents and local organizers told the Chatham County Board of Commissioners they do not want a proposed 28-mile Enbridge Gas pipeline routed through farms, rivers and drinking-water catchments. At a special public-comment meeting, speakers cited past spills and explosions and urged county action to require special-use permits and environmental review.

"Please utilize further assessments and requirements for Enbridge, such as a special use permit and a thorough environmental impact statement from the Army Corps of Engineers before allowing this project to continue," Amanda Clark said, citing public-health concerns for wells and soil. Multiple speakers described Enbridge’s record in other states and said a pipeline under the Rocky, Deep and Haw rivers threatens the county’s water resources and farmland.

Speakers pressed the board to use whatever local authority exists — including passing a resolution of opposition, requiring conditional-use or special-use permitting for pipelines, filing to intervene in state utility dockets, and demanding independent environmental reviews — before state or federal permitting moves forward. Several speakers, including planning-board members and scientists, highlighted the project’s proximity to sensitive waterways and rare species and urged the board to prepare formal documentation for the state review process.