Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Tree Removal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
DRC moves to treat two hazardous trees at 419 North as consent items after urban‑forester recommendation
Summary
Staff presented COAs to remove two failing trees at 419 North (Buckingham Historic District); the urban forester recommended removal (36" oak and a 16" pine) and the DRC agreed the two mapped removals could go on the consent agenda while a newly discovered third tree will be handled separately.
Get email alerts on the Tree Removal topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff brought COA 2612 for 419 North Rudy Road in the Buckingham Historic District after an urban‑forester inspection identified hazardous trees that staff said pose a fall risk to nearby residential buildings. John McNair, the county’s historic preservation specialist, summarized the forester’s findings and species recommendations: “it was inspected by the urban forester” and the oak “has a diameter of 36 inches” with “multiple open cavities and visible decay.”
Property manager Juan Neda, joining virtually, confirmed the trunk was failing: “The the base the trunk started snap splitting, and 0.5 of, like, the top is, you know, decaying or it’s dead.” After review of the photographs and the forester’s note that the tree exhibited advanced deterioration, DRC members signaled the two trees shown on the posted map could be approved on the consent agenda, characterizing the removals as noncontroversial but asking staff to confirm replacement species and placement.
Why it matters: staff and board members asked that replacement plantings respect the Buckingham historic character and tree canopy, and requested staff confirm whether recommended species match the district’s tree inventory before final planting decisions. The DRC also asked staff to check whether proposed replacements could be planted near the existing canopy to avoid a gap in cover. The surprise third tree discovered in the field will be submitted as its own COA and handled as a discussion item at the HLRB.
Next steps: staff will post materials for the consent items and include the urban‑forester assessment in the HLRB packet; the applicant will submit the COA for the third tree so it can be advertised for the August cycle.

