Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Land Use topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Staff flag ADU impact-fee ambiguity and inspections on properties across Highway 89
Summary
Staff discussed unclear ADU impact-fee rules—attached ADUs interpreted by some as exempt while detached ADUs may incur fees—and reported plans for about eight building inspections focused on properties across Highway 89 and verification of conditional use permits.
City staff raised concerns about ambiguity in the city's ordinance on accessory dwelling units (ADUs), noting that some interpret the existing language as waiving additional impact fees for attached ADUs while detached ADUs may warrant fees. The minutes cite a Smith property with a detached ADU connected by a breezeway; staff said the driveway will be serviced by the main house and that an old house on the lot will be demolished with a new foundation and relocation planned.
The building inspector reported plans to conduct approximately eight inspections by year-end, focusing on properties across the highway to ensure corrected conditions and compliance. Staff also said they will verify existing conditional use permits for businesses on the other side of the highway and consider updating permit definitions and conditional-use allowances to reflect current practice.
