Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Film Incentive topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Staff proposes pilot film incentive funded from reserves, recommends return with final draft

Visit Broken Arrow Tourism Board · January 14, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Staff outlined a proposed pilot film incentive that would mirror state rebates, use reserve funding ($1.2M shown as available), require local spending and at least 25% of shooting days in Broken Arrow, and include a possible hotel-room rebate; staff asked the board for a cap and direction to prepare a final application for council approval.

City tourism staff presented a draft film incentive program aimed at attracting production spending to Broken Arrow and described it as a pilot to be funded initially from reserve funds. The presenter said the state has driven major film-related spending across Oklahoma and that local incentives let cities stack local rebates on top of state programs.

"We have $1,200,000 in our reserve fund," the presenter told the board while explaining that reserves could seed a pilot. The staff recommendation described a standard local rebate approach (10–25% back on eligible local spend), minimum local spend thresholds, and an application that would require receipts and a permit. The presenter noted one sample rule that other communities use: "25% of shooting days must be in Broken Arrow." Staff also proposed a hotel-room incentive — $500 back for every 12 room nights — stackable with the production rebate, and discussed options to reimburse or support temporary production-office space.

Board members asked about caps, measurable outcomes, and marketing. Staff said the state will add the city to its list automatically once a local incentive is adopted, giving instant visibility, and that staff intend to build a locations and services database for scouts. The presenter floated a competitive posture (seeking to be larger than neighboring incentives) and suggested a notional $100,000 allocation from reserves as a possible first-year cap for major projects, while promising a final draft with explicit numbers for the next board meeting and eventual council approval.

No formal funding motion was made; staff asked for direction and said they would bring a final draft for board and council action.