Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Privacy And Tech Policy topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Assembly urges Congress to reexamine Section 230, citing online harms to youth

California State Assembly · August 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

The Assembly adopted HR 117 calling for congressional reform of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, with multiple lawmakers describing the law as outdated and enabling harms to young people; the resolution was framed as bipartisan.

Assemblymember Bauer Kehane introduced HR 117, a resolution urging Congress to reform Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act and to consider the bipartisan Sunset Section 230 Act to create a window for targeted reform.

Bauer Kehane described cross‑party agreement on the need for reform and recounted a personal account from Rep. Duffy of South Carolina about the harms of sextortion that helped shape the panel discussion. "Its expansive grant of immunity has enabled some of history's most profitable companies to disregard or even facilitate foreseeable harms as an acceptable cost of growth," Bauer Kehane said.

Several lawmakers spoke in support. Assemblymember Pappen said tech-heavy districts experience harms that merit guardrails, and Assemblymember Lowenthal and others described legal and mental-health harms to youth tied to platform algorithms. Assemblymember Dixon, a joint author, noted broad harms that have persisted while courts interpreted Section 230 protections expansively.

The Assembly adopted HR 117 by voice vote and added dozens of coauthors; sponsors said the resolution calls on Congress to begin a structured federal process to modernize immunity while preserving what works.