Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Operation Arctic Frost topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Senate subcommittee hears sharply divided testimony on 'Operation Arctic Frost'
Summary
A Senate Judiciary subcommittee heard competing views on "Operation Arctic Frost": majority members and witnesses said documents show a politicized, large-scale probe of conservatives; Democrats and other witnesses defended standard investigatory steps after January 6 and urged Jack Smith be called to testify.
Chairman Schmidt opened the hearing by accusing the Biden administration of deploying a "whole of government effort" to investigate and "dismantle a political movement," saying the committee would release documents he said show prosecutors discussed ways to get around speech-and-debate protections.
"Whether the coercive powers of the federal government were used as a political weapon against the opposition," Schmidt said, framing the panel’s inquiry into what the chairman and witnesses called "Arctic Frost." The majority argued the operation swept in former officials, lawyers, conservative organizations and members of Congress.
Ranking Member Senator Welch countered that the inquiry followed normal investigative steps after the January 6 attack and stressed the gravity of the events that prompted the probe. "I was in the House chamber that day. I was about 20 feet from where the shot was fired," Welch said, describing why a thorough investigation was appropriate.
Witnesses called by the majority — including Dr. Dan Epstein of America 1st Legal and former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark — offered differing assessments. Epstein said the committee’s records show broad coordination and politicization; Clark described personal harms he said flowed from overlapping investigations and said he had been targeted.
Senators on both sides spent the hearing disputing whether subpoenas for noncontent phone records, nondisclosure orders and the seizure of government devices crossed constitutional lines or were ordinary law-enforcement steps in a complex, multijurisdictional investigation. Several Democrats urged Chairman Schmidt to subpoena special counsel Jack Smith to testify under oath; Republicans pressed for statutory reforms such as Senate confirmation for special counsels.
The committee set a deadline for written questions and responses and adjourned, leaving in place sharp partisan disagreement about whether Arctic Frost was lawful oversight or partisan "lawfare."
