Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Parking Fees topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board keeps Campbell High parking fee at $100 after debate over equity and maintenance costs

Litchfield School Board · August 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Administrators proposed reducing CHS parking from $100 to $60 to curb illegal parking on adjacent Talent Road and ease costs for families; the board kept the current $100 fee while asking administration for more data on pavement maintenance needs and illegal parking counts.

Administrators proposed lowering Campbell High School's student parking fee to make spots more affordable and to discourage off‑campus parking on nearby Talent Road. Principal Mitchison explained the research comparing nearby schools ("Raymond is $20 a year; Prospect Mountain is 15; Newfound is $5; Guilford is free"), said the school sells about 100 permits and estimated a $60 fee with prorating for late licenses, and described the student activities revolving fund balance (about $50,000) that helps maintain the lot.

Board members questioned whether reduced revenue would jeopardize parking‑lot maintenance. One board member flagged that the revolving account is used for upkeep, lighting and restriping; another asked for a projected schedule of sealing and repaving costs to judge whether lower fees are sustainable. The administration offered a ballpark reseal/lines cost of roughly $14,000 for a "soup to nuts" service and said more detailed quotes would be provided.

After discussion about enforcement on Talent Road and the town's role (no‑parking signs fall to the district if placed on the town road adjacent to school property), the board voted to approve the CHS handbook as presented; the handbook still reflects the existing $100 fee, and the board directed administration to collect data on illegal parking patterns and timing of future maintenance to revisit the fee question if needed.

"I think it's twofold," the principal said of the proposal, explaining the balance between affordability and parking‑lot upkeep. The motion to approve the CHS handbook (which will keep the existing fee structure) carried 5–0.