Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Special Education Services topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Board weighs continuing True North contract vs. building in-house special-education services

Lake Bluff ESD 65 Board of Education · January 20, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Board heard two options for special-education services: extend the True North partnership under a new two-year commitment or develop an in-house team for speech, PT, assistive technology and vision services; administration set a Feb. 1 decision deadline and said services would not lapse during transition.

The Lake Bluff ESD 65 Board on Jan. 20 considered two paths for delivering special-education services for 2026–27: continue the district’s contract with True North under newly required two-year terms or build an in-house team to provide Speech & AAC, Physical Therapy, Assistive Technology and Vision services.

Superintendent Dr. Lisa Leali and True North representative Tracy Roehrick presented the options and trade-offs. Leali said administration remains “committed to utilizing True North’s expertise regardless of the chosen path” but noted the vendor now requires a two-year service commitment. Roehrick described the staffing and service model changes and estimated costs are still pending.

Administration recommended Option 2 — developing internal capacity — citing opportunities to grow staff expertise and provide tailored professional development. Under the staff-driven model, the district would leverage current special-education teachers to cover adaptive physical education and enter an intergovernmental agreement with District 115 and District 67 to share a physical therapist.

Leali told the board a final commitment to True North for the 2026–27 school year is required by Feb. 1 and assured there would be no lapse in student services during any transition. "We must navigate new requirements, including a two-year service commitment rather than the previous one-year term," she said.

The board did not take a final vote on the service option at the meeting; administration will return with cost details and a recommendation before the Feb. 1 deadline.