Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Valuation Method topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Assessor defends mass-valuation method and waterfront premium during Kennebunk abatement hearing

Board of Assessment Review (Town of Kennebunk) · June 30, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Assessor Dan Robinson defended the Town's mass-valuation approach, the use of a land-residual technique, and the practice of applying higher values to waterfront parcels—even when only a small sliver fronts the water—citing 41 Great Hill Road as a benchmark.

Assessor Dan Robinson told the Board that Kennebunk uses a mass-valuation approach with a land-residual technique because vacant-land sales are limited, and that waterfront properties command higher values even when only a small portion directly borders water. Robinson repeatedly stated, "A property is either waterfront or it is not," and cited 41 Great Hill Road (sold in 2021 for $4.25 million) as a key benchmark used by the Assessment Office.

Town attorney Benjamin T. McCall urged the Board to require stronger evidence that the applicants had met their burden to show substantial overvaluation, saying "one sale does not make the market." Robinson and McCall both emphasized the Assessment Office's obligation to apply consistent treatment to like properties in Kennebunk.