Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Property Assessment topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Homeowners lose bid to cut Kennebunk land assessment near Webhannet Golf Course
Summary
The Board of Assessment Review denied Shelia Littlefield’s abatement request for 220 Sea Road, finding she did not prove the town’s mass appraisal produced a "substantial overvaluation." The panel rejected the applicant’s comparables and upheld the assessed land value after a 3–0 vote.
Shelia Littlefield asked the Town of Kennebunk Board of Assessment Review on March 30 to reduce the land valuation for her property at 220 Sea Road, arguing the assessment was "manifestly wrong." The homeowner told the board the parcel abuts the golf course maintenance lot and has views of metal buildings, dirt piles and equipment rather than the course, daily maintenance noise from about 14–18 vehicles and machinery in warmer months starting near 6 a.m., and a lack of privacy at the 8th tee. Littlefield said she spent approximately $18,000 to clear fallen trees and plant an evergreen screen to mitigate the impacts and provided photographs comparing nearby properties' views. She requested the land value be reduced to $498,000, lowering the total assessed value to $1,175,000, and cited a March 29, 2026 Zillow estimate of $1,754,700 as context.
Assessing Director Dan Robinson defended the assessor's mass appraisal approach and the team's use of a land residual technique to estimate land value where vacant land sales are sparse. Robinson noted two prior abatements affecting the parcel (a $145,900 adjustment for easements and $19,600 for acreage error) and said the assessor had applied a 10% "condition on land" adjustment to reflect the maintenance-lot view. He told the board that "adjustments are generally limited to 10% without direct market evidence to support a larger one," and that the applicant’s proposed comparable (215 Sea Road) was less probative because its sale occurred in 2011; instead the office relied on three recent sales on the golf-course corridor.
Board members emphasized the legal standard for a successful abatement: the applicant must show a "substantial overvaluation" because assessments are presumed valid. The board said Littlefield did not submit a formal appraisal or broker's opinion sufficient to overturn the town's model. A board member noted the applicant had not met the burden to prove the assessment was "manifestly wrong." Wayne Berry moved to deny the appeal; Tom Wellman seconded, and the board voted 3–0 to uphold the assessment for 220 Sea Road.
The board’s denial leaves the town’s assessed values intact; the decision was procedural in nature and hinged on evidentiary standards for abatement appeals rather than a factual finding that there were no adverse impacts at the property.
