Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the Elk Management topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Elko CAB backs streamlined Alternative 3 for elk subplans, urges local guardrails

Elko County CAB to Manage Wildlife · June 9, 2025
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

After discussion and public comment, the Elko County CAB voted to recommend Alternative 3—a streamlined approach to adopt local elk population objectives—citing faster timelines and use of stakeholder guardrails; members also discussed using existing damage-compensation funds (approx. $2.1M) to address local impacts.

The CAB discussed revisions to the statewide elk management plan and considered three alternatives: no action; a traditional, multi-year subplan process; and a streamlined Alternative 3 intended to allow quicker adoption of local population objectives. After public comment and staff explanations, the CAB voted to recommend support for Alternative 3.

"That being said, alternative 3 is direct evaluation of population objectives in the Elk State Management Plan," the chair said, framing the option as a faster path that could meet local needs in under a year. Travis Allen of the Nevada Department of Wildlife said Alternative 3 would still allow public process and stakeholder participation, not just numeric population targets: "Alternative 3 would allow, the language there is kept in such a way that it allows the public process and this process with this board to make... alternative suggestions."

Public commenters and CAB members emphasized that damage-compensation programs and mitigation funds must be usable by smaller landowners. A number cited roughly $2,100,000 as existing funding in the elk damage compensation account and urged better mechanisms to deploy those funds locally. Several members urged guardrails so population changes do not surprise permittees or landowners.

The CAB recorded a motion and voice vote recommending Alternative 3 to the department and State Wildlife Commission. The recommendation is advisory; any regulatory or statutory changes will proceed through the commission and, if required, the legislature.