Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the School Funding topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Commission on School Funding proposes weight stacking, removal of quintile and outlines $4,000 per‑pupil funding gap

Nevada State Board of Education · August 4, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Guy Hobbs presented the Commission's recommendations to the Board: phase in stacking of weighted funding categories (with discounts to avoid double counting) once Nevada approaches 70–90% of the national per‑pupil average; recommend removing a strict quintile cutoff for at‑risk identification and entrust the Board to set a periodic threshold; and noted the Commission's estimate that Nevada is roughly $4,000 below the national per‑pupil average.

Guy Hobbs, chair of the Commission on School Funding, told the Board the commission is working through 28 legislatively directed topics to refine Nevada’s people‑centered funding plan and will submit a BDR within about 30 days and a full report in mid‑November. He described technical work on adjusted base funding, enrollment‑count methodology and the question of whether weights for English learners and at‑risk students should be stacked. "We have made a determination through analysis that in the state of Nevada we're roughly $4,000 per student below the national average in per pupil funding," Hobbs said, and recommended that stacking be implemented only when funding reaches a target range so it does not erode base funding for all students.

Hobbs reiterated the commission's recommendation to remove the hard quintile cutoff from the at‑risk definition and proposed the State Board set a threshold every two years informed by appropriate statistical and contextual information. He said the commission is reviewing WestEd analysis of the grad‑score model and asked the Board to work with the commission and its third‑party verifiers on alternatives that are more transparent and less volatile for budgeting. Hobbs also emphasized the potential role of education service centers to help districts implement changes consistently across very different county contexts.