Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Measure G topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
District sells $20 million Series G bonds at 4.55% but trustees press for clearer taxpayer impact
Summary
Business-services staff and financial advisers told trustees the district sold $20 million of Measure G bonds at a 4.55% interest rate and was oversubscribed. Board members pressed whether the sale increased long-term taxpayer liability and asked for clearer baseline comparisons for asserted savings.
Bank and financial advisers presented results of the district's recent $20 million Series G bond sale and answered board questions about proceeds and long-term repayment.
Jim Kim of Bank of America said the district secured a double-A minus credit rating and that the sale was well-subscribed: "We offered $20,000,000 of bonds... The interest rate we locked in at the end of the day was 4.55%." He told trustees investor demand totaled about $120 million of orders for the $20 million offering and explained that oversubscription helped secure a lower rate and a taxpayer premium that will reduce the district's levy calculations.
Board discussion focused on how the sale affects measure G's overall repayment profile. Jim Kim and the district's business officer confirmed net funding delivered to Los Angeles County was about $19.7 million after transaction fees, with roughly $1.265 million in premium set aside to reduce the tax levy. Board member Preet said she had been "under the assumption that it was gonna save, not increase debt," and asked the presenters to clarify the baseline for savings and how the new issuance differs from refunding transactions. Presenters said this issuance is "new-money" for projects (not a refunding) and showed repayment modeled over 29 years, yielding an estimated total repayment near $40.4 million under current assumptions.
Trustees asked follow-up about underwriting commissions, maturity length (29 years chosen to match project useful lives and preserve future bonding capacity), and opportunities to refinance if rates decline. Financial staff said the district intentionally staged measure G draws to preserve the targeted $60-per-$100,000 assessed valuation tax rate and to match project cash flows, and that they would monitor future market opportunities to deliver additional taxpayer savings.
