Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the County Budget topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Bamberg County Council advances FY 2026–27 budget with second-reading approval; one dissent

Bamberg County Council · May 5, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Council approved second reading in title only of the FY 2026–27 operating and capital budget, a proposal totaling $13,917,448 (a $1,383,003 increase). The vote was 4–1 in favor with one member dissenting and two members absent; council scheduled further budget work sessions.

Bamberg County Council on May 5 approved second reading in title only of the proposed FY 2026–27 operating and capital budget after a presentation from Controller Gina Smith.

"The proposed Budget FY 26-27 general fund totals $13,917,448 an increase of $1,383,003 from last year’s budget," Controller Gina Smith said during her presentation, which outlined department requests and line-item increases.

Councilman Evert Comer moved the measure and Councilman Spencer Donaldson seconded it. Voting in favor were Comer, Donaldson, Vice Chairman Larry Haynes and Dr. Jonathan Goodman; Councilman Kenneth Ahlin voted no. Council Chairwoman Michelle Martin and Councilwoman Sharon Hammond were absent from the vote.

Finance Director T.M. Thomas had earlier summarized the county’s fiscal position through January 2026: FY 2026 general fund revenue was reported at $12,534,004 with $9,678,004 collected through January; departments had expended approximately 57.72% ($7,234,003) of their budgets, leaving revenues exceeding expenditures by about $2,444,004 for the report period.

Councilmembers asked questions during Controller Smith’s slide presentation about specific departmental increases; the council accepted the presentation as information and scheduled budget work sessions for additional review and clarification before final readings.

This action was procedural (second reading in title only). The ordinance’s third reading and the public hearing were postponed in related business and will be revisited at future meetings as staff provides additional detail.