Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!
Get email alerts on the Review Panel Composition topic
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
Commission debates returning to five‑member review panels as staff warn of scheduling bottlenecks
Summary
Commissioners debated whether to urge the city council to change review panels from 3 members (2 civilians, 1 sworn) back to 5 (3 civilians, 2 sworn). Proponents said five members improve deliberation; OPCR staff warned smaller panels allow 5–8 panels per month versus 2–3 with five‑member panels, increasing throughput.
Commissioners discussed whether to recommend that the city council restore five‑member review panels for complaint adjudication, a shift some commissioners said would improve deliberation while staff warned it would reduce panel throughput.
"I would think it would be ideal if we had panels again of 5 members," Commissioner Smith said, arguing more perspectives improve case review quality. Several commissioners echoed the view that additional sworn representation helps surface operational context.
OPCR staff noted scheduling constraints and capacity tradeoffs: "When we had a 5 person panel, we would schedule around 2 to 3 panels a month. Right now, with a 3 person panel, we're able to schedule anywhere from 5 to 8 panels a month," an OPCR representative told the commission, emphasizing that smaller panels can clear more cases while the intake pipeline remains strong.
Commissioners did not vote on an ordinance change at the meeting but asked staff for a formal analysis and recommended forming a task group to evaluate ordinance revisions and timing before approaching the city council.
