Citizen Portal
Sign In

Get Full Government Meeting Transcripts, Videos, & Alerts Forever!

Get email alerts on the 3 Springs Subdivision topic

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

Developers present conceptual plan for 3 Springs Phase 3; commission gives verbal OK to proceed

St John Town Plan Commission · August 6, 2026
AI-Generated Content: All content on this page was generated by AI to highlight key points from the meeting. For complete details and context, we recommend watching the full video. so we can fix them.

Summary

Doug Redig of DVG presented a conceptual plan for 3 Springs Phase 3 Block 2, describing ~11–12 lots that meet new UDO lot-size minimums and a road loop completion; commissioners voiced general comfort and asked clarifying questions about duplexes, pipelines, and stormwater.

Doug Redig of DVG, representing ZNC Development, presented a conceptual subdivision plan for 3 Springs Phase 3, Block 2 and said the owners have decided to sell the remaining property and build the final phase. Redig told commissioners the lots are generally generous ("around 94 feet wide," with the ordinance minimum at 80 feet) and said the design intentionally follows new UDO zoning (SR and GR) so no PUD or variances are required. "The way it's presented tonight... I think we have 12 lots 11 lots," Redig said as he described the plan.

Redig said the project will complete a loop road and provide a stub to the south to connect to the Schilling family's land when that property develops. He noted two pipeline easements cross the northern part of the block and confirmed the plan keeps all buildings at least 50 feet away from pipelines: "No buildings will be within 50 feet of that pipeline." Commissioners asked whether the developer planned duplexes or single‑family homes; Redig said the zoning allows either and the developer expects market demand to determine the product mix. Staff confirmed that the plan will proceed through engineering review and a public hearing if the commission is generally comfortable; commissioners gave verbal confirmation to move forward pending final engineering and a revised plat.

The presentation included discussion of lot sizes, prior approvals, and the project's stormwater approach; an attendee confirmed that project‑wide detention and stormwater capacity were already provided for the overall development. No formal vote was taken at the study session; the developer will submit engineered plans and a final plat for review.